Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Zeferino Barbosa v. Wall, et al
as 17-1486
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICARDO MIGUEL ZEFERINO BARBOSA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSHUA WALL, MICHAEL W. MORRISSEY, JOSEPH LENCKI and others
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, CAROL O'BRIEN, OSVALDO VIDAL and others
Debtor:
THOMAS DICKHAUT
Morawski v. Wameling et al
as 9:2016cv01384
Plaintiff:
Dain Morawski
Defendant:
Karen Wameling, Dawn Ball, Tammy Hyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-10132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv22066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 0640
Ward v. Bellotti et al
as 1:2013cv12054
Plaintiff:
James T. Ward
Defendant:
Michael G. Bellotti , P.J. Coletta , Fred Canniff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McCrory v. Lepley et al
as 2:2013cv12586
Plaintiff:
Anthony McCrory
Defendant:
Frederick J. Lepley, Mary Kelly and Cynthia Lane
McCrory #161192 v. Lepley et al
as 1:2013cv00536
Plaintiff:
Anthony McCrory #161192
Defendant:
Frederick J. Lepley, Mary Kelly and Cynthia Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas, III v. Tate et al
as 1:2011cv00060
Plaintiff:
Earl Thomas, III
Defendant:
Mary Kelly Tate, President of Uni. of Richmond, T.C. Williams School of Law and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Serrano v. Diamond Pharmacy Services, et al
as 09-16127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD DAMIAN SERRANO
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY KELLY, Nurse Practitioner at Red Rock Correctional Center, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA and DIAMOND PHARMACY SERVICES, Prescription Drug Provider for C.C.A. at C.C.A.-Red Rock Correctional Ctr.
Serrano v. Diamond Pharmacy Services et al
as 2:2009cv00651
Plaintiff:
Richard Damian Serrano
Defendant:
Diamond Pharmacy Services, Mary Kelly and Corrections Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
