Cases 21 - 30 of 10,686
Dominick Jones v. Linsia, et al
as 24-1392
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK MAURICE JONES
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LINSIA, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GUNWIN, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER LAKE, Kent County Correctional Facility, personal capacity and others
Brown v. Lafayette Federal Credit Union, et al.
as 24-2839
Plaintiff:
WINSTON MAURICE BROWN
Defendant:
LAFAYETTE FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, HFS FINANCIAL and DOES 1-100
United States v. Franklin
as 24-3066
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MAURICE FRANKLIN, JR.
MCWILLIAMS v. MURPHY
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
MAURICE MCWILLIAMS
Defendant:
P MURPHY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacy v. Villalobos et al
as 4:2024cv00896
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Lacy
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Dana Sullivan, Nurse Practitioner Crystal Mable, UTMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watts v. Thompson et al
as 1:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
Christopher Maurice Watts
Defendant:
Thompson and PrimeCare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Terenzio, et al v. Urena, et al
as 24-1244
Plaintiff:
DELMA TERENZIO, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Joseph A. Terenzio, THOMAS SULLIVAN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John J. Sullivan and EDWARD POULIN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Maurice C. Poulin
Defendant:
FRANCISCO URENA, MARYLOU SUDDERS and CHERYL LUSSIER POPPE
Freeman v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00776
Petitioner:
Maurice Freeman
Respondent:
Warden Shelbie Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
US v. Maurice Geter
as 24-6405
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MAURICE DARNELL GETER, a/k/a Rease
Washington v. USA
as 1:2024cv03317
Petitioner:
Maurice Washington
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
