Cases 1 - 10 of 137
Puchner v. Maxwell et al
as 2:2024cv00478
Petitioner:
John D Puchner
Respondent:
Mike Maxwell, Lisa Neubauer, Eric Severson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ezenwa v. Warden, SPC Beaumont Camp
as 1:2024cv00107
Petitioner:
Maxwell Chibueze Ezenwa
Respondent:
Warden, SPC Beaumont Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Maxwell v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01188
Plaintiff:
Roderick Deshaun Maxwell
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maxwell v. Thomas
as 23-40699
Petitioner / Appellant:
William Maxwell
Respondent / Appellee:
Albert Thomas, III, Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
MAXWELL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2023cv23001
Petitioner:
JOHN MAXWELL
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Puchner v. Severson et al
as 2:2023cv01523
Petitioner:
John D Puchner
Respondent:
Eric Severson, Mike Maxwell, Hon Pepper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ray A. Maxwell v. Warden
as 2:2023cv04546
Petitioner:
Ray A Maxwell
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Maxwell v. USA
as 2:2023cv00024
Petitioner:
Gregory Neil Maxwell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
MAXWELL v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 2:2023cv00254
Petitioner:
DAWAYNE MAXWELL
Respondent:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Puchner v. Severson et al
as 2:2022cv01229
Petitioner:
John D Puchner
Respondent:
Eric Severson and Mike Maxwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
