Cases 41 - 50 of 899
Saunders v. Lopez et al
as 5:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
John F. Saunders
Defendant:
SGT. FNU Lopez, SGT. FNU Cruz, CMA Selma LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Lancaster County et al
as 8:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Travis Cox
Defendant:
Lancaster County, Lancaster County Drug Court, Touchstone Treatment Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maxwell v. FMC Devens
as 1:2023cv11489
Plaintiff:
Maurice Maxwell
Defendant:
FMC Devens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Findley v. United States of America, The et al
as 1:2023cv03020
Plaintiff:
Darrell Allen Findley
Defendant:
United States of America, The, Joe Biden, James Wesley Whine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
HARTSFIELD v. MAXWELL et al
as 4:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
ALBERT HARTSFIELD
Defendant:
MAXWELL and DANIELS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. T. Peyton, et al.
as 1:2023cv00782
Plaintiff:
Walter Ray Beasley
Defendant:
T. Peyton, Larry Leabough, Mark Culver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Ray A. Maxwell v. Warden
as 2:2023cv04546
Petitioner:
Ray A Maxwell
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Maxwell v. USA
as 2:2023cv00090
Petitioner:
Gregory Neil Maxwell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Maxwell v. Chatham County District Attorney Office
as 4:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Ricky Allen Maxwell, Jr.
Defendant:
Chatham County District Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Puchner v. Lisa Neubauer, et al
as 23-1868
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN D. PUCHNER
Defendant / Appellee:
LISA S. NEUBAUER, Honorable, MARK GUNDRUM, Honorable, MICHAEL MAXWELL, Honorable and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
