Cases 21 - 30 of 100
Winepol v. Smith et al
as 8:2022cv01955
Plaintiff:
SUSAN WINEPOL and Susan P. Winepol
Defendant:
Melissa Smith, ADAM WINEPOL and Melissa Smith doing business as Prestige Homes Investment Group
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Smith et al v. AMH 2014-1 Borrower, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00805
Plaintiff:
Dwight Smith, Catherine Smith and Bryant Smith
Defendant:
AMH 2014-1 Borrower, LLC, Does 1-25, inclusive, American Homes 4 Rent SFR, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv03487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67672
Plaintiff:
MELISSA SMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Sindu Trucking, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00544
Plaintiff:
Melissa Smith and Ruby Smith
Defendant:
Sindu Trucking, LLC and Esubalew Channe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Findling v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv00145
Plaintiff:
Darren Findling
Defendant:
United States of America, Kenneth W. Kaufmann, II, Melissa Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Smith v. Saul
as 3:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Melissa Smith and J.A.M.
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Miguel Aguirre, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 20-3620
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Keith Teribury, Mark Davis, Clyde Hammond and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Aguirre et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv02039
Plaintiff:
Harrison Bayonne, Michael Montgomery, Peggy Tucker and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
