Cases 11 - 20 of 324
Denman v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2023cv01918
Plaintiff:
Eleanor Denman
Defendant:
John Wetzel, George Little, Laurel Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Ruiz v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
Angel P Ruiz
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Centurion Health Incorporated, Richard Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
KAUFFMAN v. SMITH et al
as 3:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
DAVID R. KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
BARRY SMITH, ERIC YOUNG, BORDAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Umbra LLC v. MHM Inc
as 2:2023cv07449
Plaintiff:
Umbra LLC
Defendant:
MHM Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DICKSON v. MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS LLC
as 5:2023cv00231
Plaintiff:
Shicala Dickson
Defendant:
MHM HEALTH PROFESSIONALS LLC and CENTURION OF FLORIDA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Smith v. Rogers et al
as 1:2023cv01407
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Smith
Defendant:
MD Carla Rogers, MHM Centurion, Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAY-HARRIS v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2023cv03219
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HARRIS and QUINCY DAY-HARRIS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON COMMISSIONER BLANCHE CARNEY, WARDEN MICHELE FARRELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
