Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Rowe v. Pratt et al
as 1:2012cv00647
Plaintiff:
Ronnie L. Rowe
Defendant:
County Commissioner Bill Pratt , County Commissioner Freddie Hayes , Les Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson v. Fingerhut Direct Marketing
as 9:2012cv00052
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Patterson
Defendant:
Fingerhut Direct Marketing
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-3266
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HICA EDUCATION LOAN CORPORATION v. Patterson
as 2:2011cv12683
Defendant:
Michael S. Patterson
Plaintiff:
HICA EDUCATION LOAN CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Patterson v. NBC Universal Inc.
as 1:2011cv00068
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Patterson
Defendant:
NBC Universal Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00498
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
United States of America v. $5,676.00 in United States Currency et al
as 2:2011cv02294
Defendant:
$5,676.00 in United States Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Michael Alan Patterson and Robin Renea Wilson
Miscellaneou:
Drug Enforcement Administration and Blake Ballin
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
SUBER et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv00759
Plaintiff:
JIM SUBER , KATHY ANN MYERS , VELMA ANNE WHITE and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Patterson v. Social Security Administration et al
as 1:2011cv00271
Defendant:
City of New York and Vicinities, Social Security Administration and State of New York
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
