Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Singleton v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
as 2:2023cv00164
Petitioner:
Michael D. Singleton
Respondent:
Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Singleton v. Warden of Lackawanna County Prison
as 3:2019cv01426
Petitioner:
Michael A. Singleton
Respondent:
Warden of Lackawanna County Prison and Pennsylvania Attorney General Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Singleton v. The State of South Carolina et al
as 2:2019cv02064
Petitioner:
Michael A Singleton
Respondent:
The State of South Carolina and The Commonwealth of PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Singleton v. Eagleton
as 2:2012cv02339
Petitioner:
Michael A Singleton
Respondent:
Warden Eagleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Singleton v. South Carolina, The State of
as 2:2012cv01016
Petitioner:
Michael A Singleton #344630
Respondent:
Warden Evans Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Singleton v. State of South Carolina
as 12-11749
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL A. SINGLETON
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Singleton v. The State of South Carolina
as 2:2012cv00801
Petitioner:
Michael A. Singleton
Respondent:
Willie Eagleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Singleton v. The State of South Carolina
as 1:2012cv00586
Petitioner:
Michael A. Singleton
Respondent:
The State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Singleton v. The P.T.S. Extradition Co. et al (TVV)
as 3:2012cv00075
Petitioner:
Michael A Singleton
Respondent:
The P.T.S. Extradition Co., The State of South Carolina, The State of New Jersey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SINGLETON v. U.S. et al
as 2:2011cv07487
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A. SINGLETON
Respondent:
U.S., THE CRIMINAL SYSTEMS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
