Cases 1 - 10 of 155
Walker v. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Trustee et al
as 4:2024cv02112
Plaintiff:
Michael Chatman Walker
Defendant:
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Trustee and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Walker v. McFadden et al
as 3:2024cv00406
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Walker
Defendant:
Garry L. McFadden and Mecklenburg County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Walker v. Genesis Project 1 Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Walker
Defendant:
Genesis Project 1 Inc. and Sheila Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Lumpkin
as 4:2023cv04775
Petitioner:
Michael Gene Walker
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walker v. Village of Baldwinsville, Police, ect.
as 23-7896
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL S. WALKER
Defendant / Appellee:
Sgt. THIBAULT and Sgt. MCCALEB
Defendant:
VILLAGE OF BALDWINSVILLE
WALKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09463
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ALAN WALKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brauning v. Christian, et al
as 23-7063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB WAYNE BRAUNING
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN GILBERT CHRISTIAN, individual and Sheriff of Pontotoc County, CHARLES STEVEN KESSINGER, individual and District Judge of Pontotoc County, LORI LYNN JACKSON, individual and Associate District Judge and others
NORRIS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05876
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN NORRIS, JOHN RUMPLE, QUASHAWN CYPRESS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Norris et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00487
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Norris, John Rumple, Quashawn Cypress and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
