Cases 1 - 10 of 13
BELCHER v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY MICHAEL BELCHER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Belcher
as 3:2022cv00888
Plaintiff:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Defendant:
MICHAEL BELCHER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 Civil Proceedings to Enjoin Violations
Belcher v. Commercial Exchange, Inc.
as 2:2022cv10704
Plaintiff:
Michael Belcher
Defendant:
Commercial Exchange, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Belcher v. Sanofi SA et al
as 9:2021cv81812
Plaintiff:
Michael Belcher
Defendant:
Sanofi SA, Sanofi US Services, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis US LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BELCHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv22699
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BELCHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCHWARTZ v. TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER et al
as 3:2016cv03770
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER, TOMS RIVER MAYOR'S OFFICE, TOMS RIVER TOWN COUNSEL and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J. SCHWARTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Belcher et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv17981
Plaintiff:
Terry Belcher and Michael Belcher
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Social Security Administration et al
as 4:2013cv00135
Plaintiff:
Judith Jackson
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Michael Belcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Belcher et al v. Robertson County, Tennessee et al
as 3:2013cv00161
Plaintiff:
Michael Belcher , Shelly Belcher and Taryn Spivey
Defendant:
Robertson County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Rawls v. City of Euclid, et al
as 10-4099
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID R. RAWLS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF EUCLID, CLEVELAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, EUCLID POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
