Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Urve Maggitti v. William Mahon, et al
as 23-3275
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
MAGGITTI v. MAHON et al
as 2:2023cv04359
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
WILLIAM P. MAHON, JOHN HALL, DEBRA TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAGGITTI v. HON. BRET M. BINDER et al
as 2:2023cv02273
Plaintiff:
URVE MAGGITTI
Defendant:
HON. BRET M. BINDER, HON. ANTHONY T. VERWEY, HON. WILLIAM P. MAHON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRUNELLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv05691
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BRUNELLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michael Flanigan v. Elizabeth Panaguiten
as 10-6416
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BRUNELL FLANIGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIZABETH PANAGUITEN, MLP, J. D. ALLEN, Clinical Director, VANESSA P. ADAMS, Warden and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, General Accounting Office and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Michael Flanigan v. US
as 09-7950
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BRUNELL FLANIGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, REX BLOCKER, Physician FCI Edgefield and others
Michael Flanigan v. US
as 09-6536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BRUNELL FLANIGAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, OFFICER SMITH and others
Flanigan v. United States et al
as 2:2008cv00446
Plaintiff:
Michael Brunell Flanigan
Defendant:
United States, Harley Lappin, Officer Smith and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Flanigan v. United States et al
as 8:2008cv00941
Plaintiff:
Michael Brunell Flanigan
Defendant:
United States, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Rex Blocker and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
