Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Harris v. Reeves et al
as 3:2024cv00547
Plaintiff:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Defendant:
Robert S. Reeves, Cathy S. Palmer, Ralph Todd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gamez v. Vermillion et al
as 2:2022cv00203
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gamez
Defendant:
Dennis Vermillion, Avista Corporation fictitious entity doing business as Avista Utilities, Alvaro Figueroa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOWARD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2022cv00762
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL HOWARD
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER STILL, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER SPEISER, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER SIMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Howard v. Bailey et al
as 3:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Michael Howard
Defendant:
Bailey, Washoe County Sheriff's Offfice, Sparks Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nemes et al v. Bensinger et al
as 3:2020cv00407
Defendant:
Sarah Rogers, Marilyn Dishman, Jack Snograss and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Kearns, Erik Hermes, James "Rich" Howland and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Keisha Dorsey
Intervenor:
Amy McGrath for Senate, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00142
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Voyage Federal Credit Union et al
as 4:2019cv04024
Plaintiff:
Michael Howard Hunter and Michael Hunter
Defendant:
Voyage Federal Credit Union, First Inter-Snake Bank, Unknown named Chris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Sioux City Police Department et al
as 4:2018cv04119
Plaintiff:
Michael Howard Hunter
Defendant:
City of Rogers Police, Sioux City Police Department, Dick Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. "Doe"
as 5:2018cv05011
Plaintiff:
Michael Howard Hunter
Defendant:
Connie "Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
