Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Robinson v. USA
as 1:2026cv00195
Petitioner:
Michael Isaac Robinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Allen et al v. 3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company) et al
as 2:2025cv11718
Plaintiff:
Aaron Allen, Rodolfo G Andrada, Jr, Mary Lou Andrada and others
Defendant:
3M Company (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company), AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Allstar Fire Department and others
Debtor:
Chubb Fire LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
US v. Justin Isaac
as 25-6449
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
JUSTIN MICHAEL ISAAC, a/k/a Cali
Isaacs v. City of Susanville et al
as 2:2024cv01707
Defendant:
Michael Hoover, Kevin Singletary, City of Susanville and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Isaacs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Isaac v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
as 4:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Justin Michael Isaac
Defendant:
Freedom Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Isaac v. USA
as 2:2023cv00643
Petitioner:
Justin Michael Isaac
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
ELIAS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv55554
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ISAAC ELIAS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Justin Isaac
as 21-4079
Defendant / Appellant:
JUSTIN MICHAEL ISAAC, a/k/a Cali
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Isaac v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
as 3:2020cv01993
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.
Plaintiff:
Michael Isaac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lp
GONZALEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv80031
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ISAAC GONZALEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
