Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Simpson v. Hendersonville, Tennessee, The City of et al
as 3:2015cv00848
Plaintiff:
Michael Simpson
Defendant:
Hendersonville, Tennessee, The City of, Shawn King, Monica Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Overbaugh et al
as 9:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Michael Simpson
Defendant:
Michael Overbaugh, Raymond Catina, Vincent Cuda, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2014cv00064
Petitioner:
Michael Simpson
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Simpson v. Sun Grove Senior Living LLC et al
as 2:2014cv01127
Plaintiff:
Michael Simpson
Defendant:
Sun Grove Senior Living LLC, Karl Nunley and Susan Nunley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carbajal, et al v. Keefer, et al
as 14-1203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VICTORIA CARBAJAL, DEAN CARBAJAL and LUIS LEAL
Defendant - Appellee:
MITCHELL R. MORRISSEY, JEFFREY WATTS, ROBERT FULLER and others
In re: Michael Simpson
as 13-4568
Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL SIMPSON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Michael Simpson v. Attorney General Pennsylvania
as 13-3683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SIMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
BRAGG et al v. MALKIN et al
as 3:2013cv04899
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KEITH BRAGG, MICHAEL SIMPSON, PAUL WILKINS and others
Defendant:
STANLEY MALKIN, TORRANCE PHILLIP, PATRICIA HUNDLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2013cv01354
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Simpson
Defendant:
Mesa, City of , Jason Behnke , Richard Gogoiu and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
MSC Pipeline, LLC v. MSC Pipeline, LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00152
Plaintiff:
MSC Pipeline, LLC
Defendant:
MSC Pipeline, LLC , Longhorn Construction, LLC , Michael Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
