Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BARTLEY et al v. KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V. et al
as 2:2021cv01481
Plaintiff:
SHAWN BARTLEY, RONALD BROWN, ROBERT BROWN and others
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V, PHILIPS NORTH AMERICA LLC and PHILIPS R.S. NORTH AMERICA, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bartley et al v. Koninklijke Philips N.V. et al
as 1:2021cv11206
Plaintiff:
Shawn Bartley, Ronald Brown, Robert Brown and others
Defendant:
Koninkelijke Philps N.V., Philips North America LLC, Philips RS North America LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Workman v. Hire Technologies, Inc.
as 1:2020cv00070
Plaintiff:
Michael Workman
Defendant:
Hire Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151
WORKMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv82853
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WORKMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv11253
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WORKMAN v. PAPPAJOHN et al
as 2:2018cv14259
Defendant:
CANCER GENETICS, INC., IGOR GITELMAN, MICHAEL J. WELSH and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WORKMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Workman et al v. Kempf et al
as 1:2016cv00309
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Michael Workman and Ray Marvin Nichols
Defendant:
Kevin Kempf, Corizon Medical Services, Murray Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMMER v. KEHLER, ESQUIRE et al
as 1:2015cv02285
Plaintiff:
KAITLIN SIMMER
Defendant:
FAWN KEHLER, ESQUIRE, BOROUGH OF STONE HARBOR , DANIEL PETERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ALVAREZ v. CREWS et al
as 4:2014cv00410
Plaintiff:
ALFRED ALVAREZ
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS, WILLIAM CHURCHWELL, CHARLES SEXTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Huffman et al v. Crane Plumbing, LLC
as 6:2007cv00197
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Huffman, Jerry Blagg, David Antis and others
Defendant:
Crane Plumbing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
