Cases 1 - 10 of 280
All About Prop v. Midland Mtge
as 24-20092
Plaintiff:
All About Property, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Midland Mortgage, CitiMortgage, Incorporated and Midland Mortgage, a Division of MidFirst Bank
Breen et al v. MidFirst Bank
as 3:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Shawn Breen and Rosalia Breen
Defendant:
MidFirst Bank doing business as Midland Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Green v. Residential Acceptance Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Marcia Michelle Green
Defendant:
Residential Acceptance Corporation, Village Capital & Investments, LLC, DHI Title-Louisiana and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Clark v. Midfast Bank et al
as 2:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Torrance Clark
Defendant:
Midfast Bank, Wells Fargo, Cite Group Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Young, et al v. Midland Mortgage
as 24-1056
Plaintiff:
James C. Young and Tahnee R. Young
Defendant:
Midland Mortgage
Sipple et al v. Meyer et al
as 5:2023cv04108
Plaintiff:
Gary Sipple, Annette Sipple and Annette Evon Jeter Trust
Defendant:
Willam H. Meyer, Southlaw P.C. LLC, Greg Shaefer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01890
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Powell v. Midland Mortgage
as 4:2023cv00858
Plaintiff:
Kyland Powell
Defendant:
Midland Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Tumer v. Midfirst Bank, Midland Mortgage
as 4:2023cv01145
Plaintiff:
Patrick Andre Tumer
Defendant:
Midfirst Bank, Midland Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bowery v. Midland Mortgage
as 4:2023cv00825
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Bowery
Defendant:
Midland Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
