Cases 1 - 10 of 10
FEAGIN v. LAWSON et al
as 2:2024cv05835
Plaintiff:
EVETTE CALEN FEAGIN
Defendant:
MR. LAWSON, JEANETTE MATOS and MR. THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHEELER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
TRACEY WHEELER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DUSHAN ZATECKY, ROBERT EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crafton v. West et al
as 6:2019cv00229
Defendant:
USP McCreary, Mrs. Lawson, Mr. Carpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Joel D. Crafton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331
Winchaus Hayes v. US
as 16-7435
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WINCHAUS ANGELO HAYES
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ERIC D. WILSON, Warden, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, Director, FBOP and MR. LAWSON, Supervisor
Hayes v. Wilson et al
as 2:2014cv00532
Plaintiff:
Winchaus Hayes
Defendant:
Eric D. Wilson, (Mr.) Lawson and Charles E. Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hawkins v. Holland et al
as 6:2014cv00185
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. Hawkins, Sr
Defendant:
J. C. Holland, Ms Jamenson and Mr Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 prb
Hawkins v. Holland et al
as 1:2014cv02037
Plaintiff:
Brandon D Hawkins, Sr
Defendant:
J C Holland, Ms Jamenson and Mr Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRESTON v. LEMMON et al
as 2:2012cv00222
Defendant:
MR. BURTON, CHARLOTTE Y. DEAN, LT. FUSON and others
Plaintiff:
COREY PRESTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barker v. Sheldon et al
as 2:2009cv00081
Plaintiff:
Tom Barker
Defendant:
George Sheldon, Department of Corrections, Liberty Behavioral Healthcare Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. Canarecci et al
as 3:2007cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jose Thomas
Defendant:
Frank Canarecci, Mrs Lawson, Mrs Schroder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
