Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Al-Haqq v. Duncan et al
as 2:2026cv02123
Plaintiff:
Bilal Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Timothy Duncan, Mr. Andrews, Ms. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilcox v. Duncan et al
as 4:2026cv01975
Plaintiff:
Derick Charles Wilcox
Defendant:
Warden Duncan, Ms Carter, Mr Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
David Meyers v. A. Duncan
as 26-6308
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
A. DUNCAN, Assistant Warden, D. ANDERSON, Warden, ALL ROSP HEARINGS OFFICERS and others
Meyers v. Duncan et al
as 7:2026cv00126
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
A. Duncan, D. Anderson, All ROSP Hearings Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Al-Haqq v. Boyd et al
as 2:2025cv02907
Plaintiff:
Bilal A. Al-Haqq
Defendant:
Ms. Boyd, Ms. Kesha Fleming, Ms. B. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens v. State of Connecticut Office of the Public Defender et al
as 3:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Marvin E. Owens
Defendant:
State of Connecticut Office of the Public Defender, Tracy Jo Mathis, Michael Paris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRETT v. BIDEN et al
as 2:2018cv04738
Defendant:
MONSIGNOR LYNN, BARRY KNIGHT, KEN BRETT and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. D'ANDREA et al
as 3:2018cv14525
Defendant:
HASEEN CRITTERDON, CORY BOOKER, JOE ARYCE and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Rhasahn Grant v. Ms. Ward
as 18-6002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RHASAHN L. GRANT
Defendant - Appellee:
MRS. WARD, Corrections Officer, MR. DAY, Corrections Officer, MR. J. BATEMAN, Chief of Security and others
Grant v. Ward et al
as 1:2017cv01371
Plaintiff:
Rhasahn L. Grant
Defendant:
Mrs./Ms. Ward, Mr. Day and J. Bateman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
