Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02097
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hardman v. The Southeast Permanente Medical Group, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01281
Defendant: Malcolm Thomas Simpson and The Southeast Permanente Medical Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Donald Dwayne Hardman
Not Classified By Court: Bristol West Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Dart
as 1:2017cv08788
Plaintiff: Malcolm Thomas
Defendant: Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardman v. The Southeast Permanente Medical Group, Inc. et al (CONSENT) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00316
Plaintiff: Donald Dwayne Hardman
Defendant: The Southeast Permanente Medical Group, Inc. and Malcolm Thomas Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Zion Consulting Group LLC v. Phillips CME Church et al
as 5:2017cv00114
Plaintiff: Zion Consulting Group LLC
Defendant: Phillips CME Church and Malcolm Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08780
Plaintiff: Vonia Thomas and Malcolm Thomas
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00360
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-13296
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Randolph Agard v. City of Los Angeles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv05668
Plaintiff: Randolph Agard, Deen Alcaraz, Francisco Banuelos and others
Defendant: City of Los Angeles and Does
Thomas v. James et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv00002
Plaintiff: Malcolm Thomas
Defendant: Yonnie James, Kelly May, Christopher Auila and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?