Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MALDONANDO v. HOOKS
as 1:2019cv00671
Respondent:
ERIK A. HOOKS
Petitioner:
COREY F. MALDONANDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopez-Maldonando v. Infra-Metals Co.
as 8:2019cv01254
Plaintiff:
Carmelo Lopez-Maldonando
Defendant:
Infra-Metals Co.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Maldonado v. Sessions
as 17-1631
Petitioner:
Ramiro Maldonado and Adelma Maldonando
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
Dixon et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv06271
Defendant:
Andrew Blake, Sophia Carson, City of New York and others
Plaintiff:
John Dixon and Alexandria Hyland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Maldonando et al v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv04359
Plaintiff:
Fernando Maldonando and Yisenia Maldonado
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
DePonceau v. United States of America et al
as 9:2009cv00605
Plaintiff:
Victor Altheus DePonceau
Defendant:
United States of America, New York State, Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DePonceau v. United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv00605
Plaintiff:
Victor Altheus DePonceau
Defendant:
United States of America, New York State, Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hess v. Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 08-10808
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY DEAN HESS
Defendant - Appellee:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G LAPPIN, Director, Bureau of Prisons, REBECCA TAMEZ, Warden, FCI Fort Worth and others
Hess v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2008cv00405
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Dean Hess
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Harley G Lappin, Rebecca Tamez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Clark v. Maldonando et al
as 1:2007cv01688
Plaintiff:
John Clark
Defendant:
Gerardo Maldonando, Delra Willis, Darrel Acres and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
