Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Marburger v. Whetstone
as 4:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Timothy S marburger
Defendant:
James A Whetstone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
MARBURGER v. HENDRICKS CO DCS et al
as 1:2023cv01901
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN MARBURGER
Defendant:
HENDRICKS CO DCS, DEBRA THORPE, LINDA THORPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roger Salvatora, et al v. XTO Energy Inc
as 23-8031
Respondent:
ROGER A. SALVATORA, SANDRA E. SALVATORA, D&M MARBURGER FAMILY ENTERPRISES LP and others
Petitioner:
XTO ENERGY INC
Marburger, Jeffrey v. Soo Line Railroad Company
as 3:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A. Marburger
Defendant:
Soo Line Railroad Company doing business as Canadian Pacific Railway
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
MARBURGER v. PCI et al
as 1:2023cv00580
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN MARBURGER
Defendant:
PCI and ERIC SCHUTTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
MARBURGER v. VIGO COUNTY JAIL
as 2:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN MARBURGER
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARBURGER v. STEVENS et al
as 1:2023cv00578
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN MARBURGER
Defendant:
JONATHAN STEVENS and WEST TERRE HAUTE POLICE DEPT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp Fed. Question: Violation of Due Process
MARBURGER v. CARNEGIE
as 1:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MARBURGER
Defendant:
RICK a. CARNEGIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lyle Heyward v. Heather Cooper, et al
as 22-3781
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYLE M. HEYWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
HEATHER COOPER, in their individual capacity, CHRIS LAMBERT, in their individual capacity, JAMES HAVILAND, Warden, in their individual capacity and others
Wilson v. Marburg et al
as 2:2022cv11313
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Edmond Wilson
Defendant:
Marburg, B Carl, K. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
