Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Thomas Perkins v. Marcus Smith
as 26-2050
Plaintiff:
THOMAS PERKINS, a/k/a Thomas Tosai Perkins, on behalf of Yoshiko Marchbanks
Defendant:
MARCUS SMITH, Greenville Solicitor, ERNEST MICHAEL PATRICK O'BRIEN, Greenville Bond Court Magistrate, DON REYNOLDS, Laurens County Sheriff and others
Perkins v. Smith et al
as 6:2026cv02180
Plaintiff:
Thomas Perkins and Thomas Tosai Perkins
Defendant:
Marcus Smith, Ernest Michael Patrick O'Brien, Sr., Don Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Holtzclaw v. Smith
as 6:2026cv00096
Plaintiff:
Weldon Eugene Holtzclaw, Jr.
Defendant:
Marcus Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Hubbard v. City of Goldsboro et al
as 5:2025cv00049
Plaintiff:
Darrell Hubbard
Defendant:
City of Goldsboro, Wayne County, Alvino Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darrell Hubbard v. Goldsboro Police Department
as 24-6869
Defendant:
MIKE WEST, Police Chief, BRAD E. GOODING, Officer (815), ALVINO DANIELS, (725) and others
Plaintiff:
DARRELL HUBBARD
SMITH v. WADAS
as 2:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
MARCUS SMITH
Respondent:
J. WADAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Smith v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv02529
Defendant:
Customized Logistics Services, Inc., John Doe and Old Republic Insurance Co.
Plaintiff:
Marcus Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Hubbard v. Goldsboro Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00267
Plaintiff:
Darrell Hubbard
Defendant:
Goldsboro Police Department, Alvino Daniels, Eric Goins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00568
Petitioner:
MARCUS SMITH
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
