Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cobble et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2024cv02044
Plaintiff:
David Cobble and American Citizens
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Brad Raffensperger, Alexander Soros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cenk Uygur v. South Carolina Democratic Party
as 24-1052
Plaintiff:
CENK UYGUR and JOHN WARD
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA, HENRY MCMASTER, in his official capacity as Governor of South Carolina, ALAN WILSON, in his official capacity as Attorney General of South Carolina and others
Uygur et al v. South Carolina et al
as 3:2023cv06879
Plaintiff:
Cenk Uygur and John Ward
Defendant:
South Carolina, Henry McMaster, Alan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bradley v. Allen et al
as 4:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Dana Ruby Bradley
Defendant:
Wes Allen, Nancy Dahlstrom, Adrian Fontes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Bliss v. Anson County et al
as 3:2022cv00501
Plaintiff:
Mark Bliss
Defendant:
Anson County, Chevonne Wallace and Mark Hammonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baten et al v. McMaster et al
as 2:2018cv00510
Plaintiff:
Eugene Baten , Chester Willis , Charlette Plummer-Wooley and others
Defendant:
Henry McMaster, Mark Hammond, South Carolina Election Commission, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Emrit v. Hammond et al
as 3:2017cv02736
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Mark Hammond and Democratic Party of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
Collins v. Merrill et al
as 1:2016cv09375
Plaintiff:
Paula Collins
Defendant:
John H. Merrill, Byron Mallott, Michele Reagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hammond v. Morley et al
as 3:2011cv00053
Plaintiff:
Mark Hammond
Defendant:
Kelly Morley and Anthony Cattagio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv05058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
