Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Wilson v. Simpson et al
as 5:2023cv06114
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Wilson
Defendant:
Shona Simpson and Mark Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brian Hinkley et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05040
Plaintiff:
Brian Hinkley, Lori Humble, Alva John and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hinkley et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00832
Plaintiff:
Brian Hinkley, Lori Humble, Alva John and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Sandoval v. Peden et al
as 4:2022cv03074
Plaintiff:
Veronica Sandoval
Defendant:
Ofc. John Peden, Chief Mark Montgomery and City of Cozad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MONTGOMERY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv56741
Plaintiff:
MARK MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCCARTNEY et al v. KIDS 2, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv00166
Defendant:
KIDS 2, INC., KIDS II, INC. and KIDS 2, INC. doing business as INGENUITY
Plaintiff:
TANYA MCCARTNEY and MARK MONTGOMERY, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MONTGOMERY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv38487
Plaintiff:
MARK MONTGOMERY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Coleman et al v. United States et al
as 4:2015cv01644
Defendant:
Mark Montgomery, United States of America and Richard Callahan
Plaintiff:
Nathan Coleman and Byron Coleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Joshua v. Mobi PCS et al
as 1:2015cv00311
Plaintiff:
Deborah Ann Hokulani Joshua
Defendant:
Mobi PCS , Mark Montgomery , Juli Price and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
