Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv03074
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Tucker et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv16593
Plaintiff:
Brenda Tucker and Mark Tucker
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tucker et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-16593
Plaintiff:
Brenda Tucker and Mark Tucker
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
James Denny v. Mark Tucker
as 12-7722
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAMES DENNY
Defendant - Appellant:
MARK TUCKER, JONATHAN WIGFALL, each sued individually and TINA MAYBANK
Defendant:
BERKELEY COUNTY, WAYNE DEWITT, Sheriff of Berkely County, in his official capacity and as an individual, DEPUTY 1 and others
United States of America v. Tucker et al
as 6:2011cv01181
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michelle Rae Tucker, Mark Tucker and Eric Hager Strobel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Wilson et al v. Great West Casualty Co et al
as 5:2011cv00896
Plaintiff:
Velva C Wilson and Royce Wilson
Defendant:
Great West Casualty Co , Bancroft & Sons , Mark Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harris v. Tucker
as 1:2009cv00156
Plaintiff:
Larry Harris and Larry Harris
Defendant:
Mark Tucker
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Stuart Weitzman IP, LLC et al v. J.C. Penney, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00413
Plaintiff:
Stuart Weitzman IP, LLC, Stuart Weitzman IP, LLC, Stuart Weitzman, LLC and others
Defendant:
J.C. Penney, Inc. and Mark Tucker Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Robert L Goldman et al v. Mark Tucker Inc.
as 2:2007cv07577
Plaintiff:
Robert Goldman, Robert Goldman, Robert Goldman and others
Defendant:
Mark Tucker Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
