Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Barnette v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 9:2017cv02828
Plaintiff:
Mary Barnette
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barnett v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv11698
Plaintiff:
Mary Barnett
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Barnett v. Colvin
as 4:2016cv00444
Plaintiff:
Theresa Marie Barnett
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Locke et al v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 4:2014cv02648
Plaintiff:
Judy Locke , Donna Miller , Janete Adams and others
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Barnett v. MV Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00250
Plaintiff:
Mary Barnett
Defendant:
MV Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BARNETT et al v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2009cv68593
Plaintiff:
THOMAS M. BARNETT, THOMAS M. BARNETT, MARY BARNETT and others
Defendant:
METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Doug Morgan, et al v. Plano Independent School Dist, et al
as 09-40373
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DOUG MORGAN, ROBIN MORGAN, JIM SHELL and others
Defendant - Appellant:
LYNN SWANSON, In Her Individual Capacity and as Principal of Thomas Elementary School and JACKIE BOMCHILL, In Her Individual Capacity and as Principal of Rasor Elementary School
Amicus Curiae:
TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOL BOARDS LEGAL ASSISTANCE FUND, GATHIE BARNETT EDMONDS and MARIE BARNETT SNODGRASS
BARNETTE v. BENDIX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv85799
Plaintiff:
MARY BARNETTE, MARY BARNETTE and MARY BARNETTE
Defendant:
BENDIX CORPORATION, BENDIX CORPORATION, CHRYSLER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Mary Barnette v. Bendix Corp., et al.
as MSS/1:06-CV-00126
Defendant:
Bendix Corp
Plaintiff:
Mary Barnette
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
