Cases 31 - 40 of 45
ALMODOVAR v. COX
as 2:2015cv00879
Plaintiff:
ERNESTO ALMODOVAR
Defendant:
MATTHEW COX, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cain et al v. Aragon et al
as 1:2015cv00131
Plaintiff:
Paul Cain, Ralph Maestas, Steven Pike and others
Defendant:
FNU Aragon, E. Bravo, R. Ulibarri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv09542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
COX v. KILLION & SONS WELL SERVICE, INC.
as 2:2014cv01325
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW COX
Defendant:
KILLION & SONS WELL SERVICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Wayne Wheat v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 14-3911
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WAYNE L. WHEAT
Defendant - Appellee:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, MATTHEW COX, UNKNOWN OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES OF J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
Cox v. Fedex Freight, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv03258
Defendant:
Ivan Carhuayo and Fedex Freight, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Brewer v. Horry County et al
as 4:2014cv01912
Plaintiff:
Patricia Brewer
Defendant:
Horry County, Matthew Cox and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porcayo v. Department of Family and Protective Services et al
as 6:2013cv00713
Plaintiff:
Saul Lino Porcayo
Defendant:
Department of Family and Protective Services, Larry G Reeves, Travis Brazelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porcayo v. Department of Family and Protective Services et al
as 3:2013cv03869
Plaintiff:
Saul Lino Porcayo
Defendant:
Department of Family and Protective Services, Larry G Reeves, Travis Brazelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Slay et al
as 4:2013cv00427
Plaintiff:
Matthew Cox
Defendant:
Francis G. Slay , Bettye Battle-Turner , Richard Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
