Cases 1 - 10 of 5,026
Blevins v. Arora et al
as 5:2024cv02954
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Blevins
Defendant:
Nikesh Arora, Nir Zuk, Aparna Bawa and others
WALTON v. MCCARTHY et al
as 2:2024cv02049
Plaintiff:
TERRELL WALTON
Defendant:
JOSEPH MCCARTHY, POLICE OFFICERS JOHN DOE NOS. 1-3 and POLICE SERGEANT JOHN DOE NO. 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lane v. Baker et al
as 1:2024cv11271
Defendant:
Charles D Baker, Charlie Baker, Barbara McCarthy and others
Plaintiff:
Luanita Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
United States v. John McCarthy
as 24-1989
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
John J. McCarthy
Graham Schiff v. Anthony Brown
as 24-1408
Plaintiff:
GRAHAM HARRY SCHIFF
Defendant:
ANTHONY G. BROWN, Maryland Attorney General, JOHN MCCARTHY, Montgomery County State's Attorney, NICHOLAS PICERNO, Captain for Montgomery County Police and others
SMITH v. BARRAZA et al
as 2:2024cv01971
Plaintiff:
HAKEEM LATEEF RAKIM SMITH
Defendant:
CARLOS BARRAZA, BRIAN MCCARTHY, PATRICK CARMODY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Thornton v. Beaver County Detectives Office, et al
as 24-1825
Plaintiff:
KENNETH E. THORNTON
Defendant:
BEAVER COUNTY DETECTIVES OFFICE, in her official capacity, ALIQUIPPA SCHOOL DISTRICT, in her official capacity, PETER CARBONE, in his individual and official capacity and others
McCarthy vs Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00432
Plaintiff:
Ms. Gina Kay McCarthy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
McCarthy v. Kaplan et al
as 1:2024cv03286
Plaintiff:
Ana McCarthy
Defendant:
David Kaplan, Gabriel Clague, Samantha Clague and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
