Cases 41 - 50 of 4,048
Alonzo McKinney v. Rocha
as 2:2024cv02295
Petitioner:
Alonzo McKinney
Respondent:
Rocha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinney v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv50111
Plaintiff:
Ronald McKinney
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINNEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03713
Plaintiff:
MARTHA MCKINNEY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
MCKINNEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03508
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA MCKINNEY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCKINNEY v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv03143
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
TERRISA MCKINNEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MCKINNEY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2024cv03227
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MCKINNEY
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
McKinney v. Parker et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Bianca McKinney
Defendant:
Westbrook J. Parker and Robert J. Humphreys
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
McKinney v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Scott Joseph McKinney
Defendant:
Comm. of Soc. Sec. Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1208
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
