Cases 1 - 10 of 10,729
Webb v. First Realty et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
First Realty, Howard Glen McDonald, Robert Grimsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Citizens for a Pro-Life Society, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024cv00893
Defendant:
Clara McDonald, Jay Smith, Citizens for a Pro-Life Society, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McDonald v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Mark McDonald
Defendant:
United States of America
McDonald v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01754
Plaintiff:
Kimberly McDonald
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11560
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Stockton v. Little et al
as 1:2024cv00802
Plaintiff:
Ronald Stockton
Defendant:
George Little, John Wetzel, Thomas McGinley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evanston Insurance Company v. Harris Sliwoski LLP et al
as 1:2024cv03636
Interpleader:
Evanston Insurance Company, Harris Sliwoski LLP, Dan Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Jones v. Atlanta Public Schools et al
as 1:2024cv02045
Plaintiff:
Shirlene Jones
Defendant:
Atlanta Public Schools, Dr. Lisa Herring, Caroline Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
EVANSTONE INSURANCE COMPANY v. Harris Sliwoski LLP et al
as 1:2024cv03635
Plaintiff:
EVANSTONE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
Harris Sliwoski LLP, Dan Harris, John B. McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
