Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Conley v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv02271
Plaintiff:
Megan Conley
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Smith v. Sheriff Lenny Millholland et al
as 5:2026cv00123
Plaintiff:
Megan Smith
Defendant:
Sheriff Lenny Millholland, Deputy Dustin Crooke, SGT. Nicholas Dempsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
California South Co., et al. v. Wood
as 3:2026cv01316
Plaintiff:
California South Co. and Megan A. Epstein
Defendant:
Ginh Wood
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030 Computer Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ward v. SSA
as 2:2026cv00382
Plaintiff:
Megan Lynn Ward
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Allen v. Nollan et al
as 3:2026cv00683
Plaintiff:
Cameron Allen
Defendant:
Nathan Nollan, Megan Madrigan and Churchill County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sosa v. Lutz et al
as 9:2026cv81118
Plaintiff:
Peter I. Sosa
Defendant:
Sean M. Lutz, Megan L. Casteel, Anthony W. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv03971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
BARTON v. CITY OF CRAWFORDSVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 1:2026cv01879
Plaintiff:
DAKOTA BARTON
Defendant:
CITY OF CRAWFORDSVILLE, INDIANA, JULIAN TODD HUCKSTEP, KALEB SWICK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
