Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Banks et al v. Billie et al
as 1:2023cv00204
Plaintiff:
James Richard Banks, Melvin Banks and Bennie Beal
Defendant:
Alvin J Billie and Groendyke Transport, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In re: McIntosh County, Georgia v. Sarah Drayton, et al
as 22-11298
Petitioner:
In re: MCINTOSH COUNTY, GEORGIA
Respondent:
SARAH FRANCES DRAYTON, CAROLYN BANKS, MELVIN BANKS, SR. and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Banks et al v. Helena Marine Service Inc
as 2:2021cv00045
Defendant:
Helena Marine Service Inc
Plaintiff:
Melvin Banks and Janet Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Banks v Central Refrigerated Services Inc
as 2:2016cv00356
Plaintiff:
Melvin Banks
Defendant:
Central Refrigerated Services
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Drayton et al v. McIntosh County, Georgia et al
as 2:2016cv00053
Plaintiff:
Sarah Frances Drayton, Carolyn Banks, Melvin Banks, Sr. and others
Intervenor:
United States
Defendant:
McIntosh County, Georgia, C. Brett Cook, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Drayton et al v. McIntosh County, Georgia et al
as 1:2015cv04274
Plaintiff:
Sarah Frances Drayton , Carolyn Banks , Melvin Banks, Sr. and others
Defendant:
McIntosh County, Georgia, C. Brett Cook, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Banks v. Stevens Transport Inc
as 3:2015cv02994
Plaintiff:
Melvin Banks
Defendant:
Stevens Transport Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Banks v. Stevens Transport Inc
as 2:2015cv00117
Plaintiff:
Melvin Banks
Defendant:
Stevens Transport Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Banks v Central Refrigerated Services Inc
as 2:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
Melvin Banks
Defendant:
Central Refrigerated Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Banks v. USA - 2255
as 1:2014cv00183
Petitioner:
Gregory Melvin Banks
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
