Cases 1 - 10 of 131
DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL FILINGS SHOULD BE DOCKETED IN 5:24-HC-2042-BO. White
as 5:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
Melvin Lee White, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White
as 5:2024hc02042
Petitioner:
Melvin Lee White, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Sullivan
as 24-50093
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Melvin Lee Sullivan
Cardwell v. Doe et al
as 3:2023cv02981
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lee Caldwell and Melvin Lee Cardwell
Defendant:
Jane Doe and John Doe
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. L Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv13715
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lee Brown
Defendant:
L Oreal USA, Inc., L Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MadPlume v. Lake County Montana
as 9:2023cv00053
Petitioner:
Melvin Lee MadPlume, Jr.
Respondent:
Lake County Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melvin Luckey v. Glen Jenkins
as 22-7331
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MELVIN LEE LUCKEY
Defendant / Appellee:
GLEN JENKINS, Detective, T. J. GOFORTH, Detective, Lieutenant, CITY OF MONROE and others
Luckey v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Melvin Lee Luckey
Defendant:
Glen Jenkins, T.J. Goforth, City of Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUCKEY v. JENKINS
as 1:2022cv00576
Plaintiff:
MELVIN LEE LUCKEY
Defendant:
DETECTIVE GLEN JENKINS, DETECTIVE LIEUTENANT T.J. GOFORTH, CITY OF MONROE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
