Cases 11 - 20 of 50
QUAILE-MESSERSMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43167
Plaintiff:
BRANDON SCOTT QUAILE-MESSERSMITH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Toler v. Messersmith et al
as 4:2021cv00290
Defendant:
Southest Missouri Mental Health Center-Sex Offender Rehabilitation and Treatment Services and Jennifer Messersmith
Plaintiff:
Norman Toler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MESSERSMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv41755
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MESSERSMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Clayborne, Jr. v. Parker, et al
as 19-2410
Defendant / Appellee:
James, Sgt, #1370, Individual Capacity, Kounovsky, Offier, #1593, Individual Capacity, Messersmith, Officer, #1568, Individual Capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert Earl Clayborne, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Lincoln, Lincoln Police Department
Perez v. Larson et al
as 3:2019cv01015
Plaintiff:
Joel Perez
Defendant:
Correct Care Solution (CCS), Rockovich, Hrivanak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glover v. Boone County Jail et al
as 2:2019cv04033
Defendant:
Vessar, Messersmith, Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
AnQuan J E Glover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lofton et al v. Missersmith
as 2:2019cv00034
Petitioner:
Terence S. Lofton
Defendant:
Sarah E. Messersmith, Esq., Harold H Bartow, Esq, Jr. and Daniel F Basnight, Esq
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Lofton et al v. Missersmith
as 4:2018cv00285
Petitioner:
Terence S. Lofton
Defendant:
Sarah E. Messersmith, Esq., Harold H Bartow, Esq, Jr. and Daniel F Basnight, Esq
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Clayborne v. City of lincoln, Lincoln Police Department et al
as 8:2017cv00481
Defendant:
City of lincoln, Lincoln Police Department, Chad Hein, James and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Clayborne, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
