Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Hunt v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02003
Petitioner:
Michael Eugene Hunt
Respondent:
Todd Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Evans v. Hunt et al
as 6:2023cv02108
Plaintiff:
Donte Ricardo Evans
Defendant:
State Attorney Michael R. Hunt, Investigator T. Laufenberg and Florida Department of Law Enforcement
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Page v. Aiken County et al
as 1:2023cv04757
Plaintiff:
Donna Moyle Page
Defendant:
Aiken County, Aiken County Sheriffs Office, Michael E. Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Hunt v. Buchholtz et al
as 5:2023hc02082
Petitioner:
Michael Eugene Hunt
Respondent:
Peter Buchholtz, Morris Reid and Josh Stein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HUNT v. BASFORD et al
as 5:2022cv00213
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL H HUNT
Defendant:
LARRY BASFORD, PANAMA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, KRISTAIN SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHI v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00766
Plaintiff:
XIAOLONG SHI
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, TODD ROKITA, INDIANA SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY COMMISSION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hunt v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2021cv14235
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Hunt
Defendant:
& JOHNSON JOHNSON and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Penaloza v. Bagshaw et al
as 6:2021cv01195
Plaintiff:
Marcelino Penaloza
Defendant:
Brent Bagshaw and Michael R. Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv00800
Plaintiff:
Michael D Hunt, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Sarah B. Hunt (Deceased) and Michael D. Hunt
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
