Cases
Barringer v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv04015
Petitioner: Brandon Michael Barringer
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00043
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Cayuga Nation v. Tanner We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-1310
Plaintiff: Gary Wheeler, John Does 1-20, Richard Lynch and others
Counter Claimant: Board of Trustees of the Village of Union Springs, New York, Howard Tanner, Village of Union Springs Code Enforcement Officer, in his official capacity, Village of Union Springs, New York and others
Defendant: Edward Trufant, Village of Union Springs Mayor, in his official capacity
Barringer v. Astrue (CONSENT) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00757
Plaintiff: Robert Michael Barringer
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BARRINGER v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, et al
as 1:2010cv00184
Plaintiff: MICHAEL BARRINGER
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and CIMARRON COACH OF VIRGINIA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Ramah Navajo Chapter v. Lujan, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:1990cv00957
Plaintiff: Ramah Navajo Chapter
Defendant: Manuel Lujan , Eddie Brown , Marvin Pierce and others
Amicu: Chugachmiut and Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc.
Movant: Klamath Tribes, Confederated Tribes of SiletzIndians of Oregon , Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan and others
Claimant: Confederated Tribes of SiletzIndians of Oregon and Navajo Agricultural Products Industry
Objector: United South and Eastern Tribes, Inc.
Miscellaneou: Class Counsel
Interpleader: Alturas Indian Rancheria, Phillip Del Rosa , Darren Rose and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?