Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Bonner v. Economic Improvement Council, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Michael Bonner
Defendant:
Economic Improvement Council, Inc., Landon Mason Sr. and Vanessa Jackson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Bonner v. Economic Improvement Council, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Michael Bonner
Defendant:
Economic Improvement Council, Inc., Landon Mason Sr. and Vanessa Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Carson v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv00490
Plaintiff:
Phillip Carson
Defendant:
District Attorney Richard Smith, County of Warren, Michael Bonner and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BONNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv23480
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BONNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv96863
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL BONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BONNER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv31179
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN MICHAEL BONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Bonner, et al v. Trustmark Corp., et al
as 17-13800
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BONNER and ANGELA BONNER
Defendant - Appellee:
TRUSTMARK CORP. and TRUSTMARK NATIONAL BANK
Evans et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2017cv01777
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Evans , Richard Anderson , John Bishop and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bonner v. Miller (TV1)
as 1:2016cv00449
Plaintiff:
Michael Bonner
Defendant:
Gayla Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
