Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Kevin Michael Castle-v-Martin O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05529
Plaintiff:
Kevin Michael Castle
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Castle v. USA
as 6:2023cv06299
Petitioner:
Michael Castle
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Tansy Develpment Company, Inc. v. Castle Vegtech, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv02936
Plaintiff:
Tansy Develpment Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Castle Vegtech, Inc., Jamina Investments, PTM Development and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Ajaj v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 19-1250
Defendant:
D. PARRY, Officer, in his official capacity, KENNETH CRANK, Inmate Trust Fund Supervisor, in his official capacity, D. PARRY, in his individual capacity and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHMAD AJAJ
CASTLE v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2019cv00459
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CASTLE
Defendant:
PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ASTRAZENECA LP, THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY and others
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Currie v. Andrews et al
as 2:2016cv14153
Plaintiff:
Marlon Currie
Defendant:
Thomas Andrews, Michigan, State of, United States of America and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Castle v. Howard et al
as 5:2011cv00221
Plaintiff:
Michael Castle
Defendant:
Paul Howard, Mark Collier and Berl Perdue, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Becker v. Hudson et al
as 1:2007cv00547
Plaintiff:
Jan F. Becker
Defendant:
Hudson, G.W. Bush, Paul D. Clement and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
