Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Maughan v. Wells et al
as 3:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Ryan Darley Maughan
Defendant:
Officer Christopher Wells, Officer S. Lloyd, Mark Knighton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cordova v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2020cv01678
Defendant:
Gerald Thompson, Arizona, State of, Charles L Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Cordova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CORDOVA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv08802
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CORDOVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Meeks v. Walmart Corperation et al
as 1:2018cv00289
Plaintiff:
Terrell L. Meeks
Defendant:
Walmart Corperation, Edwin Favela, Kara Martie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amber Jones et al v. City of Rialto
as 5:2017cv01514
Plaintiff:
David Hernandez, Joseph Brown, Shaun R Mooney and others
Petitioner:
Carl Jones
Defendant:
City of Rialto
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB v. Pohl, et al.
as 1:2016cv00111
Plaintiff:
Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
Defendant:
Fred Pohl, Lillian E. Pohl, FNU LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Geico Indemnity Company v. Cordova et al
as 4:2016cv00066
Plaintiff:
Geico Indemnity Company
Defendant:
Sean Michael Cordova , Mary Dysart and Brandon Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Heaney v. Costigan, et al
as 12-1228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN STEPHEN HEANEY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES COSTIGAN, MICHAEL CORDOVA, NOEL IKEDA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00433
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Heaney v. Costigan et al
as 1:2009cv01006
Plaintiff:
John Stephen Heaney
Defendant:
James Costigan, Michael Cordova, Noel Ikeda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
