Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Chernofsky et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11812
Plaintiff:
Morris Chernofsky, John Cherry, Jeffrey Cheslowitz and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Archroma U.S., Inc, Arkema Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Shekar v. Brooks et al
as 1:2025cv09251
Defendant:
James Adolph Wright, Lloyd James Brooks, MICHAEL CROWE and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Shekar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roger Shekar v. Lloyd Brooks, et al
as 25-2422
Plaintiff:
ROGER SHEKAR
Defendant:
LLOYD JAMES BROOKS, MICHAEL CROWE, PETER SULLIVAN and others
SHEKAR v. BROOKS et al
as 2:2025cv03691
Defendant:
JAMES ADOLPH WRIGHT, LLOYD JAMES BROOKS, MICHAEL CROWE and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER SHEKAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Altamirano v. Arizona Board of Regents
as 2:2025cv02257
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Altamirano
Defendant:
Arizona Board of Regents, Peter J Fischer, Lou Ann Denny and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Chaudhry v. Rezy Group Inc et al
as 3:2025cv01322
Plaintiff:
Faisal Chaudhry
Defendant:
Michael Crow and Rezy Group Inc
Counter-Claimant:
Michael Crow
Counter-Defendant:
Michael Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
HAFOKA et al v. CONDUENT INCORPORATED
as 2:2025cv03437
Plaintiff:
KRISTIN HAFOKA, ERIN FULLER RANDALL, DIANNA DAY and others
Defendant:
CONDUENT INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Allen v. Crow et al
as 2:2024cv00225
Defendant:
Warden Michael Crow and Guards
Plaintiff:
Danny Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
