Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Oliver v. State of Alabama (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Oliver
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
WATERS II v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv12911
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DARNELL WATERS II
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MURPHY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10632
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DARNELL MURPHY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Tate Rehmet Law Office et al
as 3:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Tate Rehmet Law Office and J Bart Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harvey v. Ford et al
as 1:2022cv05141
Petitioner:
Michael Darnell Harvey
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of Georgia and Warden Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
as 6:2022cv04388
Petitioner:
Michael Darrell Thomas and Michael Darnell Thomas
Respondent:
State of South Carolina and Warden Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Code Enforcement Business et al
as 3:2022cv01907
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Code Enforcement Business, Stacey Graves, The MacFarlane Firm PC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Gorman et al
as 3:2022cv01875
Plaintiff:
Michael Darnell Jones
Defendant:
Esther Gorman, Gene Gorman, Code Enforcement Cedar Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Parson v. Warden
as 22-12364
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL DARNELL PARSON
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
