Cases 1 - 10 of 15
SMITH JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv18120
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E SMITH JR
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Progressive Preferred Insurance Company v. Smith et al
as 2:2020cv00762
Defendant:
Michael E Smith, Nicole Gilbert and David M Smith
Plaintiff:
Progressive Preferred Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Troupe v. Fenderson et al
as 2:2019cv01318
Defendant:
Emily S Mueller, Antoinette Rich, Alice Rudebusch and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Troupe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC
as 3:2019cv01589
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. BP America Production Company
as 2:2018cv09491
Plaintiff:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc. and Michael E Smith
Defendant:
BP America Production Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0051
USA v. Michael E. Smith
as 16-6726
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL E. SMITH
Brooks et al v. The Griffin Security Agency, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02303
Plaintiff:
Rusebio Brooks , Carlita Thomas , James Malloy and others
Defendant:
The Griffin Security Agency, Inc. and Michael E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Smith v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 3:2012cv00238
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Smith
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. United States of America
as 6:2009cv00275
Petitioner:
Michael E Smith
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
