Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Christensen v. Curry County et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Richard Christensen
Defendant:
Curry County, Brad Alcorn, Chris Paasch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perry v. Town of Reading et al
as 1:2021cv11367
Plaintiff:
David Perry
Defendant:
Town of Reading, Kristyn Kelly, Joseph Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03678
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Fisher v. City of Monroe et al
as 2:2020cv01253
Defendant:
Amy Bright, Michael Fitzgerald, Ben Swanson and others
Plaintiff:
Seth Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martin Reiner v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv08655
Defendant:
Elizabeth Grimes, Roy Weatherup, Karen Stevenson and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Reiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shawn Donley v. Ciummo & Associates, et al
as 18-15482
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN ARLIN DONLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CIUMMO & ASSOCIATES, MICHAEL FITZGERALD, Chief Defense Attorney and RYAN HICKEY, Attorney at Law
Donley v. Ciummo & Associates, et al.
as 1:2018cv00244
Plaintiff:
Shawn Arlin Donley
Defendant:
Ciummo & Associates, Michael Fitzgerald and Ryan Hickey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bates v. Winnebago County et al
as 3:2018cv50006
Plaintiff:
John Bates
Defendant:
Winnebago County, Thomas Warmoth, Wesley Ganz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CURLEY v. MONMOUTH COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS et al
as 3:2017cv12300
Plaintiff:
JOHN CURLEY
Defendant:
MONMOUTH COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS , SERENA DIMASO, ESQ. , THOMAS ARNONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young Song v. James Welch
as 11-6156
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YOUNG BOK SONG
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES WELCH, Police Officer, MICHAEL FITZGERALD, Police Officer and ROBERTO RIVERA, Police Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
