Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Morris v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2014cv04068
Plaintiff:
J Michael Fitzgerald Morris, IV
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Michael Fitzgerald v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 14-2875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL FITZGERALD
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY
FITZGERALD v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2014cv00238
Petitioner:
MICHAEL FITZGERALD
Respondent:
MARK CAPOZZA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Goslee et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv33722
Plaintiff:
Robyn S. Goslee and Michael Fitzgerald
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv02319
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Fitzgerald v. Barkley
as 1:2013cv02452
Plaintiff:
Michael Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Kimberly A. Barkley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruno v. Oosthuizen
as 2:2013mc00121
Plaintiff:
Autumn Marie Bruno
Trustee:
K Michael Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Philippus Oosthuizen
Fitzgerald et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv21920
Plaintiff:
Linda Fitzgerald and Michael Fitzgerald
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FITZGERALD et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2013cv00257
Plaintiff:
LINDA FITZGERALD and MICHAEL FITZGERALD
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, ETHICON INC and ETHICON LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FITZGERALD et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as ME/2:13-cv-00257
Plaintiff:
LINDA FITZGERALD and MICHAEL FITZGERALD
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
