Cases 11 - 20 of 33
United States v. Hendrix
as 16-3023
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL HENDRIX
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv12900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hendrix v. Resource Residential et al
as 3:2015cv01173
Plaintiff:
Michael Hendrix
Defendant:
Resource Residential and Unum Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Dawn Guidotti v. Legal Helpers Debt Resolution, et al
as 15-1054
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAWN GUIDOTTI, on behalf of herself and all other class members similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
LEGAL HELPERS DEBT RESOLUTION, LLC also known as The Law Firm of Macey, Aleman, Hyslip and Searns, ECLIPSE SERVICING INC, formerly known as Eclipse Financial Inc, LEGAL SERVICES SUPPORT GROUP LLC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
GLOBAL CLIENT SOLUTIONS, LLC and ROCKY MOUNTAIN BANK AND TRUST OF COLORADO SPRINGS COLORADO
United States v. Hendrix
as 14-3239
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL HENDRIX
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Global Client Solutions LLC et al
as 2:2014cv06643
Plaintiff:
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Defendant:
Global Client Solutions LLC, Global Holdings LLC, Michael Hendrix and others
Rodriguez v. Hendrix
as 5:2014cv05035
Plaintiff:
Edgar Ivan Rodriguez
Defendant:
Michael Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez v. Hendrix
as 5:2014cv05034
Plaintiff:
Julio Jesus Rodriguez
Defendant:
Michael Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez et al v. Hendrix
as 5:2013cv05249
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Rodriguez, Julio Jesus Rodriguez and Edgar Ivan Rodriguez
Defendant:
Michael Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodriguez et al v. Hendrix
as 4:2013cv00616
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Rodriguez, Julio Jesus Rodriguez and Edgar Ivan Rodriguez
Defendant:
Michael Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
