Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Hoover v. Act Fast Bail LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00020
Plaintiff: Jason Michael Hoover
Defendant: Act Fast Bail LLC and Lacy Hubber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hoover v. Due et al
as 2:2022cv00051
Plaintiff: Michael Hoover
Defendant: Justin Due and Putnam County, TN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Paul Hoover
as 22-2427
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: PAUL MICHAEL HOOVER
Hoover v. Corbin et al
as 3:2022cv00036
Plaintiff: Paul Michael Hoover
Defendant: Patricia D. Corbin, Christopher Meyer, Ellen Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hoover v. Bayless
as 5:2022cv00044
Petitioner: Paul Michael Hoover
Respondent: Warden M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hoover v. Bowers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00118
Petitioner: Paul Michael Hoover
Respondent: F.J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv15138
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Maccarone v. Lineage Law, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00212
Defendant: Michael Hoover, Lineage Law, LLC and Stephanie Prestridge
Plaintiff: Lauren Maccarone
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
HOOVER et al v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv05144
Plaintiff: LORI ANN HOOVER and MICHAEL HOOVER
Defendant: DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walters v. FedEx Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv01051
Plaintiff: Misty Walters
Defendant: FedEx Corporation , FedEx Express, Inc. , FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?