Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Jividen v. USA et al
as 0:2019cv00052
Defendant:
Kristen Whitson, Thomas B. Smith, Mrs. Waumagan and others
Plaintiff:
Bernard R. Jividen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lester v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al.
as 8:2017cv01627
Petitioner:
Michael Lester
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv12088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Christopher Lester v. Bradford Phelps, et al
as 14-2604
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Christopher Michael Lester
Defendant - Appellee:
Bradford J. Phelps, Chief Deputy, Arkansas Attorney General, Marvin Evans, Jr., Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, William Straughn, Warden, Tucker Unit, ADC and others
LESTER et al v. BANK OF AMERICA NA, et al
as 3:2014cv00202
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LESTER and KAREN LESTER
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA NA , BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING INC, PROPERTY CONSULTANTS AND ADVISORS LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lester v. Phelps et al
as 5:2014cv00099
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Lester
Defendant:
Bradford J Phelps, Marvin Evans, Jr, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv06605
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Lester v. Harris et al
as 5:2011cv00284
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Lester
Defendant:
Jarod A Harris, C Penister, Anthony L Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lester v. Ruh et al
as 5:2011cv00227
Plaintiff:
Christopher Michael Lester
Defendant:
A Ruh, Anthony L Jackson, Alfred J Burton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
