Cases 71 - 80 of 192
MITCHELL v. ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
as 2:2017cv11471
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MITCHELL and DONNA MITCHELL
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and ASTRAZENECA, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2017cv11664
Plaintiff:
Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
Janssen Ortho LLC, Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00394
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Mitchell, et al v. Joseph Chronister, et al
as 17-16552
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ANTHONY MITCHELL, MICHAEL MITCHELL and LINDA MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSEPH CHRONISTER, Captain, MICHAEL WALLER, Sergeant, TRAVIS SNYDER, Officer and others
Moody et al v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv02029
Plaintiff:
Dolphin Moody , Ezekial Aguilar , D'Marcus Barnes and others
Defendant:
Ortho-McNeil Jannsen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Company and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Michael Mitchell v. USA
as 17-2327
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL MITCHELL
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Mitchell v. Williams et al
as 6:2017cv00087
Plaintiff:
Michael Mitchell
Defendant:
Doug Williams, Bryan Hinton and Mercedes Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis v. Hardin et al
as 5:2017cv00085
Plaintiff:
Tori T. Curtis
Defendant:
Michael Mitchell, Skyla Grief, Troy Belt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Connecticut
as 3:2017cv00762
Petitioner:
Michael Mitchell
Respondent:
State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Mitchell
as 1:2017cv02815
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
