Cases 41 - 50 of 500
MOORE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11103
Plaintiff:
CHARLES MICHAEL MOORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stearns v. Cantrell et al
as 5:2023cv05061
Plaintiff:
Justin Stearns
Defendant:
Sheriff Jay Cantrell, Zachary Causey, Michael Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Cooper et al
as 1:2023cv00093
Defendant:
Ralph Gilbert, III, Douglas Gold, Roy Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance L. James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv05666
Plaintiff:
AARON MICHAEL MOORE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. Dolgencorp, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC and Dollar General Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Cross v. Unknown Defendants
as 4:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Arthur Cross, Jr.
Defendant:
Palo Pinto County Courthouse, Unknown Defendants, Palo Pinto Co. Courthouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore et al v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2023cv00742
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore and Mary Ann Moore
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore et al v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv11368
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore and Carolyn Moore Truster
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moore v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
Michael Moore
Defendant:
Commissioner Kilolo Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Michael Moore v. USA
as 23-10324
Petitioner / Appellant:
MICHAEL MOORE
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
