Cases 31 - 40 of 65
Duffy v. Nevada Dept. of Corrections
as 2:2015cv00148
Petitioner:
Michael Patrick Duffy
Respondent:
Nevada Dept. of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sather v. Kenney et al
as 8:2014cv00350
Defendant:
Director of NDCS
Et.al:
Michael L. Kenney
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Sather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KATES v. CHRISTIE et al
as 2:2014cv05769
Plaintiff:
EDWARD KATES
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRIS CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WILSON v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2014cv03746
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, JAMES T. PLOUSIS, SAMUEL J. PLUMERI, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEELY v. DELAWARE COUNTY PRISON et al
as 2:2014cv03212
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATRICK NEELY
Defendant:
DELAWARE COUNTY PRISON and COMMUNITY EDUACTION CENTER (CEC)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. CHC Medical et al
as 3:2013cv08272
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Hayes
Defendant:
CHC Medical, Arshad Tariq and Paul Bosseler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon v. Gruenwald et al
as 2:2013cv01614
Defendant:
10 other unnamed persons, Dr. Dewsnup, Dr. Christopher Diguilio and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Dillon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael McClish v. Randy Ground
as 13-16353
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL PATRICK MCCLISH
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDY GROUNDS, Warden
Wahl v. Atkinson
as 2:2013cv01344
Petitioner:
Michael Patrick Wahl
Respondent:
Kenny Atkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anglen v. Fayette County Jail et al
as 6:2013cv00126
Plaintiff:
Michael Patrick Anglen
Defendant:
Fayette County Jail and Phillip Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
